| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20150209153554.GC8758@l.oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 10:35:54 -0500
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To: "Wang, Xiaoming" <xiaoming.wang@...el.com>
Cc: "ralf@...ux-mips.org" <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
"boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com" <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
"david.vrabel@...rix.com" <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
"linux-mips@...ux-mips.org" <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux@...izon.com" <linux@...izon.com>,
"lauraa@...eaurora.org" <lauraa@...eaurora.org>,
"heiko.carstens@...ibm.com" <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
"d.kasatkin@...sung.com" <d.kasatkin@...sung.com>,
"takahiro.akashi@...aro.org" <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>,
"chris@...is-wilson.co.uk" <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
"pebolle@...cali.nl" <pebolle@...cali.nl>,
"Liu, Chuansheng" <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>,
"Zhang, Dongxing" <dongxing.zhang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] modify the IO_TLB_SEGSIZE to io_tlb_segsize configurable
as flexible requirement about SW-IOMMU.
On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 02:13:30AM +0000, Wang, Xiaoming wrote:
> Dear Wilk:
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [mailto:konrad.wilk@...cle.com]
> > Sent: Saturday, February 7, 2015 2:12 AM
> > To: Wang, Xiaoming
> > Cc: ralf@...ux-mips.org; boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com;
> > david.vrabel@...rix.com; linux-mips@...ux-mips.org; linux-
> > kernel@...r.kernel.org; xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org; akpm@...ux-
> > foundation.org; linux@...izon.com; lauraa@...eaurora.org;
> > heiko.carstens@...ibm.com; d.kasatkin@...sung.com;
> > takahiro.akashi@...aro.org; chris@...is-wilson.co.uk; pebolle@...cali.nl; Liu,
> > Chuansheng; Zhang, Dongxing
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] modify the IO_TLB_SEGSIZE to io_tlb_segsize
> > configurable as flexible requirement about SW-IOMMU.
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 12:10:15AM +0000, Wang, Xiaoming wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [mailto:konrad.wilk@...cle.com]
> > > > Sent: Friday, February 6, 2015 3:33 AM
> > > > To: Wang, Xiaoming
> > > > Cc: ralf@...ux-mips.org; boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com;
> > > > david.vrabel@...rix.com; linux-mips@...ux-mips.org; linux-
> > > > kernel@...r.kernel.org; xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org; akpm@...ux-
> > > > foundation.org; linux@...izon.com; lauraa@...eaurora.org;
> > > > heiko.carstens@...ibm.com; d.kasatkin@...sung.com;
> > > > takahiro.akashi@...aro.org; chris@...is-wilson.co.uk;
> > > > pebolle@...cali.nl; Liu, Chuansheng; Zhang, Dongxing
> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] modify the IO_TLB_SEGSIZE to io_tlb_segsize
> > > > configurable as flexible requirement about SW-IOMMU.
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 07:01:14AM +0800, xiaomin1 wrote:
> > > > > The maximum of SW-IOMMU is limited to 2^11*128 = 256K.
> > > > > While in different platform and different requirements this seems
> > improper.
> > > > > So modify the IO_TLB_SEGSIZE to io_tlb_segsize as configurable is
> > > > > make
> > > > sense.
> > > >
> > > > More details please. What is the issue you are hitting?
> > > >
> > > Example:
> > > If 1M bytes are requied. There has an error like.
> >
> > Ok, but even with 1MB size - you only have 64 'slots' (if you allocate an 64MB
> > buffer). And the other 'slots' can be fragmented so you might still not have
> > enough 1MB chunks available.
> >
> > Do you have some thoughts on how that would be addressed?
> >
> Yes,
> If IO_TLB_SEGSIZE is 128 the slabs is 32K/128 = 256
> While IO_TLB_SEGSIZE is 512 the slabs is 32K/512 =64 (for 1M).
> So it is dilemma between slabs and segsize.
Right.
> I have a thought how about modifying the IO_TLB_DEFAULT_SIZE to
> io_tlb_default_size configurable too?
It would seem that 'io_tlb_default_size' should be influenced by
the 'io_tlb_segsize' - as in have some calculation that would
come up with the best value (if there is one?)
> Because of the multivariate requirement.
>
> > > [ 31.474769] dwc3_otg 0000:00:16.0:
> > dwc3_intel_byt_notify_charger_type(): dwc3_intel_byt_notify_charger_type:
> > invalid SDP current!
> > > [ 31.554077] android_work: sent uevent USB_STATE=CONNECTED
> > > [ 31.564244] android_usb gadget: high-speed config #1: android
> > > [ 31.571468] android_work: sent uevent USB_STATE=CONFIGURED
> > > [ 31.942738] DMA: Out of SW-IOMMU space for 1048576 bytes at device
> > gadget
> > > [ 31.950345] Kernel panic - not syncing: DMA: Random memory could be
> > DMA written
> > > [ 31.950345]
> > > [ 31.960170] CPU: 1 PID: 172 Comm: droidboot Tainted: G W
> > 3.10.20-x86_64_byt-g1077f87 #2
> > > [ 31.970086] Hardware name: Intel Corp. VALLEYVIEW C0
> > PLATFORM/BYT-T FFD8, BIOS BLADE_21.X64.0004.R14.1412311144
> > FFD8_X64_R_2014_12_31_1151 12/31/2014
> > > [ 31.985053] 0000000000100000 ffff880136c2fc98 ffffffff82967d45
> > ffff880136c2fd10
> > > [ 31.993327] ffffffff82961761 0000000000000008 ffff880136c2fd20
> > ffff880136c2fcc0
> > > [ 32.001590] ffffffff829618fb 0000000000000002 ffffffff820aeff9
> > 0000000000008d8c
> > > [ 32.009871] Call Trace:
> > > [ 32.012610] [<ffffffff82967d45>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b
> > > [ 32.018353] [<ffffffff82961761>] panic+0xc8/0x1d6
> > > [ 32.023707] [<ffffffff829618fb>] ? printk+0x55/0x57
> > > [ 32.029258] [<ffffffff820aeff9>] ? console_unlock+0x1f9/0x460
> > > [ 32.035772] [<ffffffff82347cbe>] swiotlb_map_page+0x12e/0x140
> > > [ 32.042283] [<ffffffff82599d4d>]
> > usb_gadget_map_request+0x16d/0x220
> > > [ 32.049387] [<ffffffff8255ce89>] dwc3_gadget_ep_queue+0x229/0x460
> > > [ 32.056297] [<ffffffff825b4624>] ffs_epfile_io.isra.96+0x3e4/0x520
> > > [ 32.063296] [<ffffffff820e438d>] ? get_parent_ip+0xd/0x50
> > > [ 32.069427] [<ffffffff82975a61>] ? sub_preempt_count+0x71/0x100
> > > [ 32.076142] [<ffffffff825b47b8>] ffs_epfile_read+0x28/0x30
> > > [ 32.082370] [<ffffffff821b6b8c>] vfs_read+0x9c/0x170
> > > [ 32.088014] [<ffffffff821b765d>] SyS_read+0x4d/0xa0
> > > [ 32.093562] [<ffffffff8297b179>] ia32_do_call+0x13/0x13
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Zhang Dongxing <dongxing.zhang@...el.com>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: xiaomin1 <xiaoming.wang@...el.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > arch/mips/cavium-octeon/dma-octeon.c | 2 +-
> > > > > arch/mips/netlogic/common/nlm-dma.c | 2 +-
> > > > > drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c | 6 +++---
> > > > > include/linux/swiotlb.h | 8 +------
> > > > > lib/swiotlb.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> > > > > 5 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/dma-octeon.c
> > > > > b/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/dma-octeon.c
> > > > > index 3778655..a521af6 100644
> > > > > --- a/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/dma-octeon.c
> > > > > +++ b/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/dma-octeon.c
> > > > > @@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ void __init plat_swiotlb_setup(void)
> > > > > swiotlbsize = 64 * (1<<20);
> > > > > #endif
> > > > > swiotlb_nslabs = swiotlbsize >> IO_TLB_SHIFT;
> > > > > - swiotlb_nslabs = ALIGN(swiotlb_nslabs, IO_TLB_SEGSIZE);
> > > > > + swiotlb_nslabs = ALIGN(swiotlb_nslabs, io_tlb_segsize);
> > > > > swiotlbsize = swiotlb_nslabs << IO_TLB_SHIFT;
> > > > >
> > > > > octeon_swiotlb = alloc_bootmem_low_pages(swiotlbsize);
> > > > > diff --git a/arch/mips/netlogic/common/nlm-dma.c
> > > > > b/arch/mips/netlogic/common/nlm-dma.c
> > > > > index f3d4ae8..eeffa8f 100644
> > > > > --- a/arch/mips/netlogic/common/nlm-dma.c
> > > > > +++ b/arch/mips/netlogic/common/nlm-dma.c
> > > > > @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ void __init plat_swiotlb_setup(void)
> > > > >
> > > > > swiotlbsize = 1 << 20; /* 1 MB for now */
> > > > > swiotlb_nslabs = swiotlbsize >> IO_TLB_SHIFT;
> > > > > - swiotlb_nslabs = ALIGN(swiotlb_nslabs, IO_TLB_SEGSIZE);
> > > > > + swiotlb_nslabs = ALIGN(swiotlb_nslabs, io_tlb_segsize);
> > > > > swiotlbsize = swiotlb_nslabs << IO_TLB_SHIFT;
> > > > >
> > > > > nlm_swiotlb = alloc_bootmem_low_pages(swiotlbsize);
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c b/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c
> > > > > index 810ad41..3b3e9fe 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c
> > > > > @@ -164,11 +164,11 @@ xen_swiotlb_fixup(void *buf, size_t size,
> > > > unsigned long nslabs)
> > > > > dma_addr_t dma_handle;
> > > > > phys_addr_t p = virt_to_phys(buf);
> > > > >
> > > > > - dma_bits = get_order(IO_TLB_SEGSIZE << IO_TLB_SHIFT) +
> > > > PAGE_SHIFT;
> > > > > + dma_bits = get_order(io_tlb_segsize << IO_TLB_SHIFT) +
> > > > > +PAGE_SHIFT;
> > > > >
> > > > > i = 0;
> > > > > do {
> > > > > - int slabs = min(nslabs - i, (unsigned long)IO_TLB_SEGSIZE);
> > > > > + int slabs = min(nslabs - i, (unsigned long)io_tlb_segsize);
> > > > >
> > > > > do {
> > > > > rc = xen_create_contiguous_region( @@ -187,7
> > > > +187,7 @@ static
> > > > > unsigned long xen_set_nslabs(unsigned long nr_tbl) {
> > > > > if (!nr_tbl) {
> > > > > xen_io_tlb_nslabs = (64 * 1024 * 1024 >> IO_TLB_SHIFT);
> > > > > - xen_io_tlb_nslabs = ALIGN(xen_io_tlb_nslabs,
> > > > IO_TLB_SEGSIZE);
> > > > > + xen_io_tlb_nslabs = ALIGN(xen_io_tlb_nslabs, io_tlb_segsize);
> > > > > } else
> > > > > xen_io_tlb_nslabs = nr_tbl;
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/swiotlb.h b/include/linux/swiotlb.h
> > > > > index e7a018e..13506db 100644
> > > > > --- a/include/linux/swiotlb.h
> > > > > +++ b/include/linux/swiotlb.h
> > > > > @@ -8,13 +8,7 @@ struct dma_attrs; struct scatterlist;
> > > > >
> > > > > extern int swiotlb_force;
> > > > > -
> > > > > -/*
> > > > > - * Maximum allowable number of contiguous slabs to map,
> > > > > - * must be a power of 2. What is the appropriate value ?
> > > > > - * The complexity of {map,unmap}_single is linearly dependent on
> > > > > this
> > > > value.
> > > > > - */
> > > > > -#define IO_TLB_SEGSIZE 128
> > > > > +extern int io_tlb_segsize;
> > > > >
> > > > > /*
> > > > > * log of the size of each IO TLB slab. The number of slabs is
> > > > > command line diff --git a/lib/swiotlb.c b/lib/swiotlb.c index
> > > > > 4abda07..50c415a 100644
> > > > > --- a/lib/swiotlb.c
> > > > > +++ b/lib/swiotlb.c
> > > > > @@ -56,6 +56,15 @@
> > > > > int swiotlb_force;
> > > > >
> > > > > /*
> > > > > + * Maximum allowable number of contiguous slabs to map,
> > > > > + * must be a power of 2. What is the appropriate value ?
> > > > > + * define io_tlb_segsize as a parameter
> > > > > + * which can be changed dynamically in config file for special usage.
> > > > > + * The complexity of {map,unmap}_single is linearly dependent on
> > > > > + this
> > > > value.
> > > > > + */
> > > > > +int io_tlb_segsize = 128;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +/*
> > > > > * Used to do a quick range check in swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single and
> > > > > * swiotlb_tbl_sync_single_*, to see if the memory was in fact
> > > > > allocated by
> > > > this
> > > > > * API.
> > > > > @@ -97,12 +106,20 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(io_tlb_lock); static
> > > > > int late_alloc;
> > > > >
> > > > > static int __init
> > > > > +setup_io_tlb_segsize(char *str)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + get_option(&str, &io_tlb_segsize);
> > > > > + return 0;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +__setup("io_tlb_segsize=", setup_io_tlb_segsize);
> > > > > +
> > > > > +static int __init
> > > > > setup_io_tlb_npages(char *str)
> > > > > {
> > > > > if (isdigit(*str)) {
> > > > > io_tlb_nslabs = simple_strtoul(str, &str, 0);
> > > > > - /* avoid tail segment of size < IO_TLB_SEGSIZE */
> > > > > - io_tlb_nslabs = ALIGN(io_tlb_nslabs, IO_TLB_SEGSIZE);
> > > > > + /* avoid tail segment of size < io_tlb_segsize */
> > > > > + io_tlb_nslabs = ALIGN(io_tlb_nslabs, io_tlb_segsize);
> > > > > }
> > > > > if (*str == ',')
> > > > > ++str;
> > > > > @@ -183,7 +200,7 @@ int __init swiotlb_init_with_tbl(char *tlb,
> > > > > unsigned long nslabs, int verbose)
> > > > >
> > > > > /*
> > > > > * Allocate and initialize the free list array. This array is used
> > > > > - * to find contiguous free memory regions of size up to
> > > > IO_TLB_SEGSIZE
> > > > > + * to find contiguous free memory regions of size up to
> > > > > +io_tlb_segsize
> > > > > * between io_tlb_start and io_tlb_end.
> > > > > */
> > > > > io_tlb_list = memblock_virt_alloc( @@ -193,7 +210,7 @@ int
> > > > > __init swiotlb_init_with_tbl(char *tlb, unsigned
> > > > long nslabs, int verbose)
> > > > > PAGE_ALIGN(io_tlb_nslabs *
> > > > sizeof(phys_addr_t)),
> > > > > PAGE_SIZE);
> > > > > for (i = 0; i < io_tlb_nslabs; i++) {
> > > > > - io_tlb_list[i] = IO_TLB_SEGSIZE - OFFSET(i, IO_TLB_SEGSIZE);
> > > > > + io_tlb_list[i] = io_tlb_segsize - OFFSET(i, io_tlb_segsize);
> > > > > io_tlb_orig_addr[i] = INVALID_PHYS_ADDR;
> > > > > }
> > > > > io_tlb_index = 0;
> > > > > @@ -217,7 +234,7 @@ swiotlb_init(int verbose)
> > > > >
> > > > > if (!io_tlb_nslabs) {
> > > > > io_tlb_nslabs = (default_size >> IO_TLB_SHIFT);
> > > > > - io_tlb_nslabs = ALIGN(io_tlb_nslabs, IO_TLB_SEGSIZE);
> > > > > + io_tlb_nslabs = ALIGN(io_tlb_nslabs, io_tlb_segsize);
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > bytes = io_tlb_nslabs << IO_TLB_SHIFT; @@ -249,7 +266,7 @@
> > > > > swiotlb_late_init_with_default_size(size_t default_size)
> > > > >
> > > > > if (!io_tlb_nslabs) {
> > > > > io_tlb_nslabs = (default_size >> IO_TLB_SHIFT);
> > > > > - io_tlb_nslabs = ALIGN(io_tlb_nslabs, IO_TLB_SEGSIZE);
> > > > > + io_tlb_nslabs = ALIGN(io_tlb_nslabs, io_tlb_segsize);
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > /*
> > > > > @@ -308,7 +325,7 @@ swiotlb_late_init_with_tbl(char *tlb, unsigned
> > > > > long nslabs)
> > > > >
> > > > > /*
> > > > > * Allocate and initialize the free list array. This array is used
> > > > > - * to find contiguous free memory regions of size up to
> > > > IO_TLB_SEGSIZE
> > > > > + * to find contiguous free memory regions of size up to
> > > > > +io_tlb_segsize
> > > > > * between io_tlb_start and io_tlb_end.
> > > > > */
> > > > > io_tlb_list = (unsigned int *)__get_free_pages(GFP_KERNEL, @@ -
> > > > 324,7
> > > > > +341,7 @@ swiotlb_late_init_with_tbl(char *tlb, unsigned long
> > > > > +nslabs)
> > > > > goto cleanup4;
> > > > >
> > > > > for (i = 0; i < io_tlb_nslabs; i++) {
> > > > > - io_tlb_list[i] = IO_TLB_SEGSIZE - OFFSET(i, IO_TLB_SEGSIZE);
> > > > > + io_tlb_list[i] = io_tlb_segsize - OFFSET(i, io_tlb_segsize);
> > > > > io_tlb_orig_addr[i] = INVALID_PHYS_ADDR;
> > > > > }
> > > > > io_tlb_index = 0;
> > > > > @@ -493,7 +510,7 @@ phys_addr_t swiotlb_tbl_map_single(struct
> > > > > device *hwdev,
> > > > >
> > > > > for (i = index; i < (int) (index + nslots); i++)
> > > > > io_tlb_list[i] = 0;
> > > > > - for (i = index - 1; (OFFSET(i, IO_TLB_SEGSIZE) !=
> > > > IO_TLB_SEGSIZE - 1) && io_tlb_list[i]; i--)
> > > > > + for (i = index - 1; (OFFSET(i, io_tlb_segsize) !=
> > > > io_tlb_segsize -
> > > > > +1) && io_tlb_list[i]; i--)
> > > > > io_tlb_list[i] = ++count;
> > > > > tlb_addr = io_tlb_start + (index << IO_TLB_SHIFT);
> > > > >
> > > > > @@ -571,7 +588,7 @@ void swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single(struct device
> > > > *hwdev, phys_addr_t tlb_addr,
> > > > > */
> > > > > spin_lock_irqsave(&io_tlb_lock, flags);
> > > > > {
> > > > > - count = ((index + nslots) < ALIGN(index + 1, IO_TLB_SEGSIZE) ?
> > > > > + count = ((index + nslots) < ALIGN(index + 1, io_tlb_segsize) ?
> > > > > io_tlb_list[index + nslots] : 0);
> > > > > /*
> > > > > * Step 1: return the slots to the free list, merging the @@ -
> > > > 585,7
> > > > > +602,7 @@ void swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single(struct device *hwdev,
> > > > phys_addr_t tlb_addr,
> > > > > * Step 2: merge the returned slots with the preceding slots,
> > > > > * if available (non zero)
> > > > > */
> > > > > - for (i = index - 1; (OFFSET(i, IO_TLB_SEGSIZE) !=
> > > > IO_TLB_SEGSIZE -1) && io_tlb_list[i]; i--)
> > > > > + for (i = index - 1; (OFFSET(i, io_tlb_segsize) !=
> > > > > +io_tlb_segsize
> > > > > +-1) && io_tlb_list[i]; i--)
> > > > > io_tlb_list[i] = ++count;
> > > > > }
> > > > > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&io_tlb_lock, flags);
> > > > > --
> > > > > 1.7.9.5
> > > > >
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists