[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOgR63foxcQtLaaS+vEQ2BKtgHGoQHn1xiLSv=4YZf=Dy6oG3w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 15:27:11 +0100
From: Bas Peters <baspeters93@...il.com>
To: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
Cc: Pushpendra Singh <pushpendra.singh@...rtplayin.com>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, navin.patidar@...il.com,
gmate.amit@...il.com, manuel.schoelling@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] staging: rtl8188eu: hal: removed code indent error
>> @@ -101,8 +101,7 @@ void rtl88eu_phy_rf6052_set_cck_txpower(struct adapter *adapt, u8 *powerlevel)
>> ptr++;
>> }
>> }
>> - rtl88eu_dm_txpower_track_adjust(&hal_data->odmpriv, 1, &direction,
>> - &pwrtrac_value);
>> + rtl88eu_dm_txpower_track_adjust(&hal_data->odmpriv, 1, &direction, &pwrtrac_value);
> you are introducing one warning to fix one error. line over 80 character.
Isn't that warning more of a guideline, rather than an actual warning?
This seems more readable than:
- rtl88eu_dm_txpower_track_adjust(&hal_data->odmpriv, 1, &direction,
- &pwrtrac_value);
+ rtl88eu_dm_txpower_track_adjust(&hal_data->odmpriv, 1,
+
&direction, &pwrtrac_value);
Bas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists