[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150210144844.GB16435@sudip-PC>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 20:18:44 +0530
From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To: Bas Peters <baspeters93@...il.com>
Cc: Pushpendra Singh <pushpendra.singh@...rtplayin.com>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, navin.patidar@...il.com,
gmate.amit@...il.com, manuel.schoelling@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] staging: rtl8188eu: hal: removed code indent error
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 03:27:11PM +0100, Bas Peters wrote:
> >> @@ -101,8 +101,7 @@ void rtl88eu_phy_rf6052_set_cck_txpower(struct adapter *adapt, u8 *powerlevel)
> >> ptr++;
> >> }
> >> }
> >> - rtl88eu_dm_txpower_track_adjust(&hal_data->odmpriv, 1, &direction,
> >> - &pwrtrac_value);
> >> + rtl88eu_dm_txpower_track_adjust(&hal_data->odmpriv, 1, &direction, &pwrtrac_value);
> > you are introducing one warning to fix one error. line over 80 character.
>
> Isn't that warning more of a guideline, rather than an actual warning?
> This seems more readable than:
>
> - rtl88eu_dm_txpower_track_adjust(&hal_data->odmpriv, 1, &direction,
> - &pwrtrac_value);
> + rtl88eu_dm_txpower_track_adjust(&hal_data->odmpriv, 1,
> +
> &direction, &pwrtrac_value);
CodingStyle says "Statements longer than 80 columns will be broken into sensible chunks,
unless exceeding 80 columns significantly increases readability and does not hide information"
i agree that this is more readable but can it be called significant improvement ? but ofcourse final decision is on Greg.
sudip
>
> Bas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists