[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150213221332.GA19975@qualcomm.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 16:13:32 -0600
From: Andy Gross <agross@...eaurora.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...ymobile.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...aro.org>,
srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: devicetree: bindings: Add Qualcomm RPM regulator
subnodes
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 05:51:06PM -0800, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> Add the regulator subnodes to the Qualcomm RPM MFD device tree bindings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...ymobile.com>
> ---
> #include <dt-bindings/mfd/qcom-rpm.h>
> @@ -66,5 +237,18 @@ frequencies.
>
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + pm8921_smps1: pm8921-smps1 {
> + compatible = "qcom,rpm-pm8921-smps";
> + reg = <QCOM_RPM_PM8921_SMPS1>;
> +
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <1225000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1225000>;
> + regulator-always-on;
> +
> + bias-pull-down;
> +
> + qcom,switch-mode-frequency = <3200000>;
> + };
> };
My only comment here is that most (all but one) of the other mfd regulator
devices use regulators {}. Still wonder if that's what we should do.
Otherwise,
Reviewed-by: Andy Gross <agross@...eaurora.org>
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists