[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150218204414.GA20943@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 21:44:14 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hpa@...or.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, arnd@...db.de, linux-mm@...ck.org,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Elliott@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] x86, mm: Support huge I/O mappings on x86
* Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com> wrote:
> This patch implements huge I/O mapping capability interfaces on x86.
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HUGE_IOMAP
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> +#define IOREMAP_MAX_ORDER (PUD_SHIFT)
> +#else
> +#define IOREMAP_MAX_ORDER (PMD_SHIFT)
> +#endif
> +#endif /* CONFIG_HUGE_IOMAP */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HUGE_IOMAP
Hm, so why is there a Kconfig option for this? It just
complicates things.
For example the kernel already defaults to mapping itself
with as large mappings as possible, without a Kconfig entry
for it. There's no reason to make this configurable - and
quite a bit of complexity in the patches comes from this
configurability.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists