[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150220125223.GA28882@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 13:52:23 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.cz>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
Ananth NMavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kprobes/x86: Use 5-byte NOP when the code might be
modified by ftrace
* Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com> wrote:
> (2015/02/20 19:26), Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.cz> wrote:
> >
> >> can_probe() checks if the given address points to the
> >> beginning of an instruction. It analyzes all the
> >> instructions from the beginning of the function until the
> >> given address. The code might be modified by another
> >> Kprobe. In this case, the current code is read into a
> >> buffer, int3 breakpoint is replaced by the saved opcode
> >> in the buffer, and can_probe() analyzes the buffer
> >> instead.
> >>
> >> [...]
> >
> > Had to drop this patch due to build failures on 32-bit x86:
> >
> > arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c:258:40: error: ‘MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE’ undeclared (first use in this function)
>
> Oops, MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE actually depends on
> CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER... I think we can use 5 instead of
> that since we are copying NOP_ATOMIC5.
Or just make the define more widely available? It's not
like the size changes from disabling the function tracer.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists