[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54E6A598.9010501@acm.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 21:10:16 -0600
From: Corey Minyard <minyard@....org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
CC: openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipmi: Remove uses of return value of seq_printf
Not a big deal, thanks for following up. Send a relative patch,
please. I already have this queued for upstream.
-corey
On 02/18/2015 06:02 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-02-18 at 11:56 -0600, Corey Minyard wrote:
>> Thanks, queued for 3.20.
> Hey Corey, thanks, but I'll either have to send a new
> patch or an updated patch changing these new
> seq_has_overflowed() uses to 0.
>
> There's no functional difference, but there is a logical
> one. has_overflowed(), if it returns "true" (it won't here
> because the first alloc seq_fs does has sufficient space)
> would not retry and simply not emit anything.
>
> Anyway, do you want a new patch or a relative patch?
>
> sorry 'bout that, Joe
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists