[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150220135842.0cd5c9338316a8a20b6a604a@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 13:58:42 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@....ntt.co.jp>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nilfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] nilfs2: fix potential memory overrun on inode
On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 22:46:35 +0900 Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@....ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> Each inode of nilfs2 stores a root node of a b-tree, and it turned out
> to have a memory overrun issue:
>
> Each b-tree node of nilfs2 stores a set of key-value pairs and the
> number of them (in "bn_nchildren" member of nilfs_btree_node struct),
> as well as a few other "bn_*" members.
>
> Since the value of "bn_nchildren" is used for operations on the
> key-values within the b-tree node, it can cause memory access overrun
> if a large number is incorrectly set to "bn_nchildren".
>
> For instance, nilfs_btree_node_lookup() function determines the range
> of binary search with it, and too large "bn_nchildren" leads
> nilfs_btree_node_get_key() in that function to overrun.
>
> As for intermediate b-tree nodes, this is prevented by a sanity check
> performed when each node is read from a drive, however, no sanity
> check has been done for root nodes stored in inodes.
>
> This patch fixes the issue by adding missing sanity check against
> b-tree root nodes so that it's called when on-memory inodes are read
> from ifile, inode metadata file.
How would one trigger this overrun? Mount an fs with a deliberately
corrupted/inconsistent fs image?
Memory overrun sounds nasty so I'm thinking we add cc:stable to this
one. OK?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists