[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150220220210.14409.84036.stgit@joelvmguard2.amd.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 16:02:10 -0600
From: Joel Schopp <joel.schopp@....com>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, David Kaplan <david.kaplan@....com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] x86: svm: use kvm_register_write()/read()
From: David Kaplan <david.kaplan@....com>
KVM has nice wrappers to access the register values, clean up a few places
that should use them but currently do not.
Signed-off-by: David Kaplan <david.kaplan@....com>
[forward port and testing]
Signed-off-by: Joel Schopp <joel.schopp@....com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 19 +++++++++----------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
index d319e0c..a7d88e4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
@@ -2757,11 +2757,11 @@ static int invlpga_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
{
struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = &svm->vcpu;
- trace_kvm_invlpga(svm->vmcb->save.rip, vcpu->arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RCX],
- vcpu->arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RAX]);
+ trace_kvm_invlpga(svm->vmcb->save.rip, kvm_register_read(&svm->vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RCX),
+ kvm_register_read(&svm->vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RAX));
/* Let's treat INVLPGA the same as INVLPG (can be optimized!) */
- kvm_mmu_invlpg(vcpu, vcpu->arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RAX]);
+ kvm_mmu_invlpg(vcpu, kvm_register_read(&svm->vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RAX));
svm->next_rip = kvm_rip_read(&svm->vcpu) + 3;
skip_emulated_instruction(&svm->vcpu);
@@ -2770,7 +2770,7 @@ static int invlpga_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
static int skinit_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
{
- trace_kvm_skinit(svm->vmcb->save.rip, svm->vcpu.arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RAX]);
+ trace_kvm_skinit(svm->vmcb->save.rip, kvm_register_read(&svm->vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RAX));
kvm_queue_exception(&svm->vcpu, UD_VECTOR);
return 1;
@@ -3133,7 +3133,7 @@ static int svm_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned ecx, u64 *data)
static int rdmsr_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
{
- u32 ecx = svm->vcpu.arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RCX];
+ u32 ecx = kvm_register_read(&svm->vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RCX);
u64 data;
if (svm_get_msr(&svm->vcpu, ecx, &data)) {
@@ -3142,8 +3142,8 @@ static int rdmsr_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
} else {
trace_kvm_msr_read(ecx, data);
- svm->vcpu.arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RAX] = data & 0xffffffff;
- svm->vcpu.arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RDX] = data >> 32;
+ kvm_register_write(&svm->vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RAX, data & 0xffffffff);
+ kvm_register_write(&svm->vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RDX, data >> 32);
svm->next_rip = kvm_rip_read(&svm->vcpu) + 2;
skip_emulated_instruction(&svm->vcpu);
}
@@ -3246,9 +3246,8 @@ static int svm_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr)
static int wrmsr_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
{
struct msr_data msr;
- u32 ecx = svm->vcpu.arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RCX];
- u64 data = (svm->vcpu.arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RAX] & -1u)
- | ((u64)(svm->vcpu.arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RDX] & -1u) << 32);
+ u32 ecx = kvm_register_read(&svm->vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RCX);
+ u64 data = kvm_read_edx_eax(&svm->vcpu);
msr.data = data;
msr.index = ecx;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists