linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] kernel/audit: consolidate handling of mm->exe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1424530825.6539.7.camel@stgolabs.net>
Date:	Sat, 21 Feb 2015 07:00:25 -0800
From:	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
To:	Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
	linux-audit@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] kernel/audit: consolidate handling of mm->exe_file

On Sat, 2015-02-21 at 08:45 -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-02-18 at 22:23 -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
> >> I'd prefer if the audit_log_d_path_exe() helper wasn't a static inline.
> >
> > What do you have in mind?
> 
> Pretty much what I said before, audit_log_d_path_exe() as a
> traditional function and not an inline.  Put the function in
> kernel/audit.c.

well yes I know that, which is why I showed you the code sizes. Now
again, do you have any reason? This function will only get less bulky in
the future.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/