[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhRPFcEYN7gfMVbVtnQgn=JhXiWiFe4__AHqaC9pqGfUPw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 08:14:28 -0500
From: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
linux-audit@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] kernel/audit: consolidate handling of mm->exe_file
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-02-21 at 08:45 -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net> wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2015-02-18 at 22:23 -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
>> >> I'd prefer if the audit_log_d_path_exe() helper wasn't a static inline.
>> >
>> > What do you have in mind?
>>
>> Pretty much what I said before, audit_log_d_path_exe() as a
>> traditional function and not an inline. Put the function in
>> kernel/audit.c.
>
> well yes I know that, which is why I showed you the code sizes. Now
> again, do you have any reason? This function will only get less bulky in
> the future.
The code size was pretty negligible from my point of view, not enough
to outweigh my preference for a non-inlined version of the function.
Also, I expect this function will be one of the things that gets
shuffled/reworked in the coming months as we make some architectural
changes to audit.
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists