[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150221.113703.2261465491790805448.konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2015 11:37:03 +0900 (JST)
From: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@....ntt.co.jp>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nilfs@...r.kernel.org,
Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] nilfs2: fix potential memory overrun on inode
On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 18:00:55 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Feb 2015 10:13:28 +0900 (JST) Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@....ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>
>> I've got a warning from 0day kernel testing backend:
>>
>> fs/nilfs2/btree.c: In function 'nilfs_btree_root_broken':
>> >> fs/nilfs2/btree.c:394:3: warning: format '%lu' expects argument of type 'long unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'ino_t' [-Wformat=]
>> pr_crit("NILFS: bad btree root (inode number=%lu): level = %d,
>> flags = 0x%x, nchildren = %d\n",
>> ^
>>
>> This is output for s390 arch since ino_t doesn't mean "unsigned long"
>> in s390.
>
> alpha uses uint for ino_t as well.
>
> It seems a bit pointless - neither arch uses ino_t in ./arch/ code. I
> suspect both could switch to ulong, which would make the world a
> slightly better place.
I entirely agree.
Regards,
Ryusuke Konishi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists