[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54E83A55.9080408@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2015 08:57:09 +0100
From: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC: mtk.manpages@...il.com,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-man <linux-man@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
LSM <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Kenton Varda <kenton@...dstorm.io>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] proc.5: Document /proc/[pid]/setgroups
Hi Eric,
Ping!
Cheers,
Michael
On 02/12/2015 02:53 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> Hello Eric,
>
> On 02/11/2015 02:51 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com> writes:
>>
>>> Hi Eric,
>>>
>>> Ping!
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Michael
>>
>> My apologies. You description wasn't wrong but it may be a bit
>> misleading, explanation below. You will have to figure out how to work
>> that into your proposed text.
>>
>>> On 2 February 2015 at 16:36, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
>>> <mtk.manpages@...il.com> wrote:
>>>> [Adding Josh to CC in case he has anything to add.]
>>>>
>>>> On 12/12/2014 10:54 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> man5/proc.5 | 15 +++++++++++++++
>>>>> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/man5/proc.5 b/man5/proc.5
>>>>> index 96077d0dd195..d661e8cfeac9 100644
>>>>> --- a/man5/proc.5
>>>>> +++ b/man5/proc.5
>>>>> @@ -1097,6 +1097,21 @@ are not available if the main thread has already terminated
>>>>> .\" Added in 2.6.9
>>>>> .\" CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS
>>>>> .TP
>>>>> +.IR /proc/[pid]/setgroups " (since Linux 3.19-rc1)"
>>>>> +This file reports
>>>>> +.BR allow
>>>>> +if the setgroups system call is allowed in the current user namespace.
>>>>> +This file reports
>>>>> +.BR deny
>>>>> +if the setgroups system call is not allowed in the current user namespace.
>>>>> +This file may be written to with values of
>>>>> +.BR allow
>>>>> +and
>>>>> +.BR deny
>>>>> +before
>>>>> +.IR /proc/[pid]/gid_map
>>>>> +is written to (enabling setgroups) in a user namespace.
>>>>> +.TP
>>>>> .IR /proc/[pid]/smaps " (since Linux 2.6.14)"
>>>>> This file shows memory consumption for each of the process's mappings.
>>>>> (The
>>>>
>>>> Hi Eric,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for this patch. I applied it, and then tried to work in
>>>> quite a few other details gleaned from the source code and commit
>>>> message, and Jon Corbet's article at http://lwn.net/Articles/626665/.
>>>> Could you please let me know if the following is correct:
>>
>> It is close but it may be misleading.
>>
>>>> /proc/[pid]/setgroups (since Linux 3.19)
>>>> This file displays the string "allow" if processes in
>>>> the user namespace that contains the process pid are
>>>> permitted to employ the setgroups(2) system call, and
>>>> "deny" if setgroups(2) is not permitted in that user
>>>> namespace.
>>
>> With the caveat that when gid_map is not set that setgroups is also not
>> allowed.
>
> Okay -- Iadded that point.
>
>>>> A privileged process (one with the CAP_SYS_ADMIN capa‐
>>>> bility in the namespace) may write either of the strings
>>>> "allow" or "deny" to this file before writing a group ID
>>>> mapping for this user namespace to the file
>>>> /proc/[pid]/gid_map. Writing the string "deny" prevents
>>>> any process in the user namespace from employing set‐
>>>> groups(2).
>>
>> Or more succintly. You are allowed to write to /proc/[pid]/setgroups
>> when calling setgroups is not allowed because gid_map is unset. This
>> ensures we do not have any transitions from a state where setgroups
>> is allowed to a state where setgroups is denied. There are only
>> transitions from setgroups not-allowed to setgroups allowed.
>
> And I've worked in the above point, rewording a bit along the way.
> So, how does the following look (only the first two paragraphs have
> changed)?
>
> /proc/[pid]/setgroups (since Linux 3.19)
> This file displays the string "allow" if processes in
> the user namespace that contains the process pid are
> permitted to employ the setgroups(2) system call, and
> "deny" if setgroups(2) is not permitted in that user
> namespace. (Note, however, that calls to setgroups(2)
> are also not permitted if /proc/[pid]/gid_map has not
> yet been set.)
>
> A privileged process (one with the CAP_SYS_ADMIN capa‐
> bility in the namespace) may write either of the strings
> "allow" or "deny" to this file before writing a group ID
> mapping for this user namespace to the file
> /proc/[pid]/gid_map. Writing the string "deny" prevents
> any process in the user namespace from employing set‐
> groups(2). In other words, it is permitted to write to
> /proc/[pid]/setgroups so long as calling setgroups(2) is
> not allowed because /proc/[pid]gid_map has not been set.
> This ensures that a process cannot transition from a
> state where setgroups(2) is allowed to a state where
> setgroups(2) is denied; a process can only trabsition
> from setgroups(2) being disallowed to setgroups(2) being
> allowed.
>
> The default value of this file in the initial user
> namespace is "allow".
>
> Once /proc/[pid]/gid_map has been written to (which has
> the effect of enabling setgroups(2) in the user names‐
> pace), it is no longer possible to deny setgroups(2) by
> writing to /proc/[pid]/setgroups.
>
> A child user namespace inherits the /proc/[pid]/gid_map
> setting from its parent.
>
> If the setgroups file has the value "deny", then the
> setgroups(2) system call can't subsequently be reenabled
> (by writing "allow" to the file) in this user namespace.
> This restriction also propagates down to all child user
> namespaces of this user namespace.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Michael
>
>
>
--
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists