lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 3 Mar 2015 12:39:48 +0100
From:	"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
To:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc:	Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
	Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-man <linux-man@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	LSM <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
	Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
	Kenton Varda <kenton@...dstorm.io>,
	stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] proc.5: Document /proc/[pid]/setgroups

Hi Eric

Ping^2!

Cheers,

Michael


On 12 February 2015 at 14:53, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
<mtk.manpages@...il.com> wrote:
> Hello Eric,
>
> On 02/11/2015 02:51 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com> writes:
>>
>>> Hi Eric,
>>>
>>> Ping!
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Michael
>>
>> My apologies.  You description wasn't wrong but it may be a bit
>> misleading, explanation below.  You will have to figure out how to work
>> that into your proposed text.
>>
>>> On 2 February 2015 at 16:36, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
>>> <mtk.manpages@...il.com> wrote:
>>>> [Adding Josh to CC in case he has anything to add.]
>>>>
>>>> On 12/12/2014 10:54 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  man5/proc.5 | 15 +++++++++++++++
>>>>>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/man5/proc.5 b/man5/proc.5
>>>>> index 96077d0dd195..d661e8cfeac9 100644
>>>>> --- a/man5/proc.5
>>>>> +++ b/man5/proc.5
>>>>> @@ -1097,6 +1097,21 @@ are not available if the main thread has already terminated
>>>>>  .\"       Added in 2.6.9
>>>>>  .\"       CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS
>>>>>  .TP
>>>>> +.IR /proc/[pid]/setgroups " (since Linux 3.19-rc1)"
>>>>> +This file reports
>>>>> +.BR allow
>>>>> +if the setgroups system call is allowed in the current user namespace.
>>>>> +This file reports
>>>>> +.BR deny
>>>>> +if the setgroups system call is not allowed in the current user namespace.
>>>>> +This file may be written to with values of
>>>>> +.BR allow
>>>>> +and
>>>>> +.BR deny
>>>>> +before
>>>>> +.IR /proc/[pid]/gid_map
>>>>> +is written to (enabling setgroups) in a user namespace.
>>>>> +.TP
>>>>>  .IR /proc/[pid]/smaps " (since Linux 2.6.14)"
>>>>>  This file shows memory consumption for each of the process's mappings.
>>>>>  (The
>>>>
>>>> Hi Eric,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for this patch. I applied it, and then tried to work in
>>>> quite a few other details gleaned from the source code and commit
>>>> message, and Jon Corbet's article at http://lwn.net/Articles/626665/.
>>>> Could you please let me know if the following is correct:
>>
>> It is close but it may be misleading.
>>
>>>>     /proc/[pid]/setgroups (since Linux 3.19)
>>>>            This file displays the string "allow"  if  processes  in
>>>>            the  user  namespace  that  contains the process pid are
>>>>            permitted to employ the setgroups(2)  system  call,  and
>>>>            "deny"  if  setgroups(2)  is  not permitted in that user
>>>>            namespace.
>>
>> With the caveat that when gid_map is not set that setgroups is also not
>> allowed.
>
> Okay -- Iadded that point.
>
>>>>            A privileged process (one with the  CAP_SYS_ADMIN  capa‐
>>>>            bility in the namespace) may write either of the strings
>>>>            "allow" or "deny" to this file before writing a group ID
>>>>            mapping   for   this   user   namespace   to   the  file
>>>>            /proc/[pid]/gid_map.  Writing the string "deny" prevents
>>>>            any  process  in  the user namespace from employing set‐
>>>>            groups(2).
>>
>> Or more succintly.  You are allowed to write to /proc/[pid]/setgroups
>> when calling setgroups is not allowed because gid_map is unset.  This
>> ensures we do not have any transitions from a state where setgroups
>> is allowed to a state where setgroups is denied.  There are only
>> transitions from setgroups not-allowed to setgroups allowed.
>
> And I've worked in the above point, rewording a bit along the way.
> So, how does the following look (only the first two paragraphs have
> changed)?
>
>        /proc/[pid]/setgroups (since Linux 3.19)
>               This file displays the string "allow"  if  processes  in
>               the  user  namespace  that  contains the process pid are
>               permitted to employ the setgroups(2)  system  call,  and
>               "deny"  if  setgroups(2)  is  not permitted in that user
>               namespace.  (Note, however, that calls  to  setgroups(2)
>               are  also  not  permitted if /proc/[pid]/gid_map has not
>               yet been set.)
>
>               A privileged process (one with the  CAP_SYS_ADMIN  capa‐
>               bility in the namespace) may write either of the strings
>               "allow" or "deny" to this file before writing a group ID
>               mapping   for   this   user   namespace   to   the  file
>               /proc/[pid]/gid_map.  Writing the string "deny" prevents
>               any  process  in  the user namespace from employing set‐
>               groups(2).  In other words, it is permitted to write  to
>               /proc/[pid]/setgroups so long as calling setgroups(2) is
>               not allowed because /proc/[pid]gid_map has not been set.
>               This  ensures  that  a  process cannot transition from a
>               state where setgroups(2) is allowed  to  a  state  where
>               setgroups(2)  is  denied;  a process can only trabsition
>               from setgroups(2) being disallowed to setgroups(2) being
>               allowed.
>
>               The  default  value  of  this  file  in the initial user
>               namespace is "allow".
>
>               Once /proc/[pid]/gid_map has been written to (which  has
>               the  effect  of enabling setgroups(2) in the user names‐
>               pace), it is no longer possible to deny setgroups(2)  by
>               writing to /proc/[pid]/setgroups.
>
>               A  child user namespace inherits the /proc/[pid]/gid_map
>               setting from its parent.
>
>               If the setgroups file has the  value  "deny",  then  the
>               setgroups(2) system call can't subsequently be reenabled
>               (by writing "allow" to the file) in this user namespace.
>               This  restriction also propagates down to all child user
>               namespaces of this user namespace.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Michael
>
>
>
> --
> Michael Kerrisk
> Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
> Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/



-- 
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ