[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54EB39CF.8050908@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 15:31:43 +0100
From: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] x86: mass removal of ARGOFFSET
On 02/21/2015 01:31 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com> wrote:
>> ARGOFFSET is zero now, removing it changes no code.
>> A few macros lost "offset" parameter, since it is always zero now too.
>
> Can you rebase this? It doesn't apply because sysret_check is gone,
> but, even if I remove the offending hunk, it's still missing things.
Sure thing.
I must be on a wrong branch? I'm on "x86/entry", and patch does apply
to the current tip of that branch:
$ git am 0001-x86-mass-removal-of-ARGOFFSET.patch
Applying: x86: mass removal of ARGOFFSET
$ git branch -a
master
* x86/entry
x86/entry-devel
remotes/origin/HEAD -> origin/master
remotes/origin/auditsc-lite
remotes/origin/checkpatch
Should I base patches on x86/entry-devel ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists