linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 03/11] x86: mass removal of ARGOFFSET

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALCETrX_L4gxDs918Ovt2_Q2V=qNqpra6VV3r2=L5+d_2cLrpA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 23 Feb 2015 08:06:46 -0800
From:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To:	Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
	Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] x86: mass removal of ARGOFFSET

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 6:31 AM, Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com> wrote:
> On 02/21/2015 01:31 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com> wrote:
>>> ARGOFFSET is zero now, removing it changes no code.
>>> A few macros lost "offset" parameter, since it is always zero now too.
>>
>> Can you rebase this?  It doesn't apply because sysret_check is gone,
>> but, even if I remove the offending hunk, it's still missing things.
>
> Sure thing.
>
> I must be on a wrong branch? I'm on "x86/entry", and patch does apply
> to the current tip of that branch:
>
> $ git am 0001-x86-mass-removal-of-ARGOFFSET.patch
> Applying: x86: mass removal of ARGOFFSET
> $ git branch -a
>   master
> * x86/entry
>   x86/entry-devel
>   remotes/origin/HEAD -> origin/master
>   remotes/origin/auditsc-lite
>   remotes/origin/checkpatch
>
> Should I base patches on x86/entry-devel ?

No, "entry" is correct.  entry-devel doesn't exist any more.  Had you
done 'git remote update'?

In any case, your rebased version is fine.

--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/