linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V4 2/2] spmi: pmic_arb: add support for hw version 2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 23 Feb 2015 18:06:10 +0200
From:	"Ivan T. Ivanov" <iivanov@...sol.com>
To:	Gilad Avidov <gavidov@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	sdharia@...eaurora.org, mlocke@...eaurora.org,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, galak@...eaurora.org,
	agross@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 2/2] spmi: pmic_arb: add support for hw version 2


Hi Gilad, 

On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 15:54 -0700, Gilad Avidov wrote:

> 
> +
> +static u32 pmic_arb_fmt_cmd_v1(u8 opc, u8 sid, u16 addr, u8 bc)
> +{
> +       return (opc << 27) | ((sid & 0xf) << 20) | (addr << 4) | (bc & 0x7);
> +}
> +
> +static u32 pmic_arb_fmt_cmd_v2(u8 opc, u8 sid, u16 addr, u8 bc)
> +{
> +       return (opc << 27) | ((addr & 0xff) << 4) | (bc & 0x7);

This one is looking suspicious. Address could be only 8 bits? Slave ID is not used?

Is this correct?

Ivan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/