[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1424775668.2340.15.camel@mm-sol.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 13:01:08 +0200
From: "Ivan T. Ivanov" <iivanov@...sol.com>
To: Gilad Avidov <gavidov@...eaurora.org>
Cc: sdharia@...eaurora.org, mlocke@...eaurora.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, galak@...eaurora.org,
agross@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 2/2] spmi: pmic_arb: add support for hw version 2
Hi Gilad,
One more comment :-).
On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 15:54 -0700, Gilad Avidov wrote:
<snip>
-static int pmic_arb_wait_for_done(struct spmi_controller *ctrl)
+static int pmic_arb_wait_for_done(struct spmi_controller *ctrl,
+ void __iomem *base, u8 sid, u16 addr)
{
struct spmi_pmic_arb_dev *dev = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
u32 status = 0;
u32 timeout = PMIC_ARB_TIMEOUT_US;
- u32 offset = PMIC_ARB_STATUS(dev->channel);
+ u32 offset = dev->ver_ops->offset(dev, sid, addr) + PMIC_ARB_STATUS;
while (timeout--) {
status = pmic_arb_base_read(dev, offset);
I see that downstream driver is using read or write base address
based on operation for which we are waiting (read_cmd/write_cmd).
Should this be reflected here?
Ivan.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists