lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+1k2cE4oLTHRLkh=F5qMKqssjQg_J4-W45CBNzZ0ocG9OSoEA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 23 Feb 2015 18:09:16 +0100
From:	Thorsten Bschorr <thorsten@...horr.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>, David Fries <David@...es.net>
Subject: Fwd: w1/slaves/w1_therm: null-ptr access of sl->family_data

Hi,

I have observed a null-pointer access in w1/slaves/w1_therm on my Raspberry
Pi running 3.18.5 with several DS18S20 temperature sensors. I have already
discussed the problem with Evgeniy.

@Evgeniy & David: sorry for re-sending my message, my email
accidentally contained a HTML part.



w1_therm: w1_slave_show checks if the sensor uses external power. If this
is the case, the mutex on dev->bus_mutex is unlocked while waiting 750 ms
for the sensor to convert the temperature. Before reading the temperature,
the mutex is again locked.

During this sleep-time, the sensor could get detached, for example by w1.c:
w1_search_process_cb not finding the sensor (*):
 !test_bit(W1_SLAVE_ACTIVE, &sl->flags) ==true.
This triggers w1_slave_detach, and hence w1_therm_remove_slave frees and
nulls sl->family_data.

w1_slave_show does not check if familiy_data is null after re-acquiring the
bus_mutex resulting in a null-ptr access when storing data.

After I've added checks for family_data!=0, I did not observe any more
crashes; the other data of struct w1_slave seem to be valid as long as any
thread executes w1_slave_show.


I have added debug-output to w1.c and w1_therm.c, here's a log of a
potential crash:

[184199.510227] w1_master_driver w1_bus_master2: w1_search_process_cb,
!W1_SLAVE_ACTIVE, calling w1_slave_detach
[184199.510276] w1_slave_driver 10-000802d9c9e4: w1_slave_detach
destroy_now 1
[184199.510297] w1_slave_driver 10-000802d9c9e4: w1_unref_slave refcnt 0
[184199.510321] w1_slave_driver 10-000802d9c9e4: w1_unref_slave: detaching
10-000802d9c9e4 [d5fb8800].
[184199.510347] w1_slave_driver 10-000802d9c9e4: w1_unref_slave ->
w1_family_notify
[184199.510365] w1_slave_driver 10-000802d9c9e4: w1_family_notify calling
remove_slave
[184199.510382] w1_slave_driver 10-000802d9c9e4: w1_therm_remove_slave
[184199.510400] w1_slave_driver 10-000802d9c9e4: w1_therm_remove_slave
refcnt -1
[184200.049745] w1_slave_driver 10-000802d9c9e4: w1_slave_show (after
sleep), family_data==0
[184200.137133] w1_slave_driver 10-000802d9c9e4: w1_slave_show (before
sleep), family_data==0
[184200.889551] w1_slave_driver 10-000802d9c9e4: w1_slave_show (after
sleep), family_data==0
[184200.930866] w1_slave_driver 10-000802d9c9e4: w1_slave_show (after
sleep), family_data==0
[184200.930907] w1_slave_driver 10-000802d9c9e4: Read failed CRC check
[184200.931002] w1_slave_driver 10-000802d9c9e4: w1_unref_slave ->
device_unregister
[184200.931169] w1 w1_unref_slave -> kfree

Note: When this crash happened, multiple threads were reading the sensor.


I could trigger the problem several times, and each time device_unregister
in w1_unref_slave was executed  *after*  w1_slave_show. In one case, the
logged time-difference between the first family_data==0 message and
device_unregister was about 8 seconds!
I have not observed a w1_slave_show call after w1_unref_slave (as long as
the device was not re-attached again).

>From my observation, the w1_slave data seem to be valid as long as
w1_slave_show is executed.
My guess is that the call of sysfs_remove_groups in w1_family_notify hits a
mutex (I did not add debug output here).


(*) On my tiny raspberry, this happens from time to time with high CPU and
external disc load (timing and/or electrical issues); it seems that the
sensor does not respond in time to the (periodic) search.


Please email me if you need further information.



Best regards,
Thorsten Bschorr
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ