linux-kernel - Re: [v3 21/26] x86, irq: Define a global vector for VT-d Posted-Interrupts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150223220457.GA9544@amt.cnet>
Date:	Mon, 23 Feb 2015 19:04:57 -0300
From:	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
To:	Feng Wu <feng.wu@...el.com>
Cc:	tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
	x86@...nel.org, gleb@...nel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com,
	dwmw2@...radead.org, joro@...tes.org, alex.williamson@...hat.com,
	jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com, eric.auger@...aro.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v3 21/26] x86, irq: Define a global vector for VT-d
 Posted-Interrupts

On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 11:14:55PM +0800, Feng Wu wrote:
> Currently, we use a global vector as the Posted-Interrupts
> Notification Event for all the vCPUs in the system. We need
> to introduce another global vector for VT-d Posted-Interrtups,
> which will be used to wakeup the sleep vCPU when an external
> interrupt from a direct-assigned device happens for that vCPU.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Feng Wu <feng.wu@...el.com>

Why an additional vector is necessary?

Can't you simply wakeup the vcpu from kvm_posted_intr_ipi, the posted
interrupt vector handler ?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/