[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150224015444.GK6236@finisterre.sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 10:54:44 +0900
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: aurélien bouin <a.bouin@...il.com>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] spi: imx: Chose DMA bits per word transfered
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 04:25:51PM +0100, aurélien bouin wrote:
> 2015-02-23 15:46 GMT+01:00 Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>:
> > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 09:44:50AM +0100, aurélien bouin wrote:
> > Once more don't top post. To repeat what I said:
> > | Why would this be a DT property? It seems like something the driver
> > | ought to be able to figure out automatically if it matters.
> > The above doesn't address my question.
> Currently the driver does not figure it out automatically, it is a fix
> 8bits per word DMA use.
You're still not explaining why it's not a better fix for the driver to
figure this out for itself, or why it's not possible for it to do that
even if it would be better.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists