[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrV_bCXwLiFPrbwVUYZh4S2Dd5d39-xU9-0v8xd+EygE8w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 12:21:34 -0800
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_32: Initialize the cr4 shadow on cpu init
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 11:53:39 -0800
> Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
>
>> This is embarrassing. I must have gotten lucky testing it.
>>
>
> The thing is, it booted fine on all my tests. It wasn't until I did
> hotplug where it crashed.
>
> I'm not sure what's in CR4 when the CPU comes up, but perhaps zero is
> fine to start out and the writes to CR4 update makes the shadow and reg
> the same. It's when we hotplug that the two become out of sync.
>
I bet that having the shadow set to zero is fine because the first
attempt to set a bit in cr4 will clear all the other bits without
harmful side effects. But if the shadow starts out at 0xffffffff or
something like that, then the early attempts to set bits will have no
effect and we'll fail.
--Andy
> Just my theory.
>
> -- Steve
--
Andy Lutomirski
AMA Capital Management, LLC
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists