linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] net: bcmgenet: fix throughtput regression

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20150227.173838.45220897334345667.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Fri, 27 Feb 2015 17:38:38 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	f.fainelli@...il.com
Cc:	jaedon.shin@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	eric.dumazet@...il.com, pgynther@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: bcmgenet: fix throughtput regression

From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 14:19:02 -0800

> If you can take Petri's change now and Jaedon then resubmits on top of
> that change, would that be acceptable?

I think it should go the other way around.

The bug should be fixed in 'net'.

Then Petri can resubmit the cleanup relative to that once I merge
'net' into 'net-next'.  It's a cleanup so it's a net-next change.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/