linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] net: bcmgenet: fix throughtput regression

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <54F0F2B7.1090507@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 27 Feb 2015 14:41:59 -0800
From:	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	jaedon.shin@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	eric.dumazet@...il.com, pgynther@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: bcmgenet: fix throughtput regression

On 27/02/15 14:38, David Miller wrote:
> From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
> Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 14:19:02 -0800
> 
>> If you can take Petri's change now and Jaedon then resubmits on top of
>> that change, would that be acceptable?
> 
> I think it should go the other way around.

I was not quite sure whether Jaedon's change could be suitable for 'net'
considering how many lines of code it involved changing, but ok, that's
better that way.

> 
> The bug should be fixed in 'net'.
> 
> Then Petri can resubmit the cleanup relative to that once I merge
> 'net' into 'net-next'.  It's a cleanup so it's a net-next change.
> 

Sure.
-- 
Florian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/