[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAAKZwv=idxvrffHx2QyW=PGH4k42ckq-VLJGQrXkeQ6NmByRQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 14:26:58 -0800
From: Tim Hockin <thockin@...kin.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Austin S Hemmelgarn <ahferroin7@...il.com>,
Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>, richard <richard@....at>,
mingo <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] add nproc cgroup subsystem
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 8:57 AM, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 08:48:12AM -0800, Tim Hockin wrote:
> > I am sorry that real-user problems are not perceived as substantial. This
> > was/is a real issue for us. Being in limbo for years on end might not be a
> > technical point, but I do think it matters, and that was my point.
>
> It's a problem which is localized to you and caused by the specific
> problems of your setup. This isn't a wide-spread problem at all and
> the world doesn't revolve around you. If your setup is so messed up
> as to require sticking to 16bit pids, handle that locally. If
> something at larger scale eases that handling, you get lucky. If not,
> it's *your* predicament to deal with. The rest of the world doesn't
> exist to wipe your ass.
Wow, so much anger. I'm not even sure how to respond, so I'll just
say this and sign off. All I want is a better, friendlier, more
useful system overall. We clearly have different ways of looking at
the problem.
No antagonism intended
Tim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists