linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] add nproc cgroup subsystem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 28 Feb 2015 17:50:36 -0500
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Tim Hockin <thockin@...kin.org>
Cc:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Austin S Hemmelgarn <ahferroin7@...il.com>,
	Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
	Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>, richard <richard@....at>,
	mingo <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] add nproc cgroup subsystem

On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 02:26:58PM -0800, Tim Hockin wrote:
> Wow, so much anger.  I'm not even sure how to respond, so I'll just
> say this and sign off.  All I want is a better, friendlier, more
> useful system overall.  We clearly have different ways of looking at
> the problem.

Can you communicate anything w/o passive aggression?  If you have a
technical point, just state that.  Can you at least agree that we
shouldn't be making design decisions based on 16bit pid_t?

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/