[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54F432CB.20800@kapsi.fi>
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 11:52:11 +0200
From: Mikko Perttunen <mikko.perttunen@...si.fi>
To: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>
CC: "linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>,
Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 03/15] soc/tegra: Add ram code reader helper
On 03/02/2015 10:46 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 11:06 PM, Tomeu Vizoso
> <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com> wrote:
>> From: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com>
>>
>> Needed for the EMC and MC drivers to know what timings from the DT to use.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> v4: Replace magic number with PMC_STRAPPING_OPT_A_RAM_CODE_SHIFT
>> ---
>> drivers/soc/tegra/fuse/tegra-apbmisc.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>> include/soc/tegra/fuse.h | 1 +
>> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/tegra/fuse/tegra-apbmisc.c b/drivers/soc/tegra/fuse/tegra-apbmisc.c
>> index 3bf5aba..dc96a62 100644
>> --- a/drivers/soc/tegra/fuse/tegra-apbmisc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/soc/tegra/fuse/tegra-apbmisc.c
>> @@ -28,8 +28,13 @@
>> #define APBMISC_SIZE 0x64
>> #define FUSE_SKU_INFO 0x10
>>
>> +#define PMC_STRAPPING_OPT_A_RAM_CODE_SHIFT 4
>> +#define PMC_STRAPPING_OPT_A_RAM_CODE_MASK_LONG (0xf << PMC_STRAPPING_OPT_A_RAM_CODE_SHIFT)
>> +#define PMC_STRAPPING_OPT_A_RAM_CODE_MASK_SHORT (0x3 << PMC_STRAPPING_OPT_A_RAM_CODE_SHIFT)
>
> I think you are slightly over 80 chars here.
>
>> +
>> static void __iomem *apbmisc_base;
>> static void __iomem *strapping_base;
>> +static bool long_ram_code;
>>
>> u32 tegra_read_chipid(void)
>> {
>> @@ -54,6 +59,18 @@ u32 tegra_read_straps(void)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +u32 tegra_read_ram_code(void)
>> +{
>> + u32 straps = tegra_read_straps();
>> +
>> + if (long_ram_code)
>> + straps &= PMC_STRAPPING_OPT_A_RAM_CODE_MASK_LONG;
>> + else
>> + straps &= PMC_STRAPPING_OPT_A_RAM_CODE_MASK_SHORT;
>> +
>> + return straps >> PMC_STRAPPING_OPT_A_RAM_CODE_SHIFT;
>> +}
>> +
>> static const struct of_device_id apbmisc_match[] __initconst = {
>> { .compatible = "nvidia,tegra20-apbmisc", },
>> {},
>> @@ -112,4 +129,6 @@ void __init tegra_init_apbmisc(void)
>> strapping_base = of_iomap(np, 1);
>> if (!strapping_base)
>> pr_err("ioremap tegra strapping_base failed\n");
>> +
>> + long_ram_code = of_property_read_bool(np, "nvidia,long-ram-code");
>
> Is this long-ram property chip-dependent? If so, couldn't we just use
> the chip ID or matched compatible string to decide whether the RAM
> code length, instead of having a dedicated property for it?
>
I am under the impression that it is board-specific.
Mikko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists