[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 12:47:00 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...ymobile.com>
Cc: Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...eaurora.org>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] mfd: devicetree: bindings: Add Qualcomm RPM
regulator subnodes
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 08:25:37PM -0800, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> +- compatible:
> + Usage: required
> + Value type: <string>
> + Definition: must be one of:
> + "qcom,rpm-pm8058-regulators"
> + "qcom,rpm-pm8901-regulators"
> + "qcom,rpm-pm8921-regulators"
Why do these subnodes have a compatible - do they ever appear except as
a child of a parent of the same type of device?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists