[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150304235126.GB18360@dastard>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 10:51:26 +1100
From: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Matt B <jackdachef@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, xfs@....sgi.com
Subject: Re: [regression v4.0-rc1] mm: IPIs from TLB flushes causing
significant performance degradation.
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 12:35:45AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com> wrote:
>
> > > After going through the series again, I did not spot why there is
> > > a difference. It's functionally similar and I would hate the
> > > theory that this is somehow hardware related due to the use of
> > > bits it takes action on.
> >
> > I doubt it's hardware related - I'm testing inside a VM, [...]
>
> That might be significant, I doubt Mel considered KVM's interpretation
> of pte details?
I did actaully mention that before:
| I am running a fake-numa=4 config on this test VM so it's got 4
| nodes of 4p/4GB RAM each.
but I think it got snipped before Mel was cc'd.
Perhaps size of the nodes is relevant, too, because the steady state
phase 3 memory usage is 5-6GB when this problem first shows up, and
then continues into phase 4 where memory usage grows again and peaks
at ~10GB....
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists