[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54F6534E.50304@broadcom.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 16:35:26 -0800
From: Arun Ramamurthy <arun.ramamurthy@...adcom.com>
To: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>
CC: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...gle.com>,
"Anatol Pomazau" <anatol@...gle.com>,
Jonathan Richardson <jonathar@...adcom.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
"bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com"
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] video: ARM CLCD: Added support for FBIO_WAITFORVSYNC
On 15-03-03 02:01 AM, Pawel Moll wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-03-02 at 19:09 +0000, Arun Ramamurthy wrote:
>> On 15-03-02 08:00 AM, Pawel Moll wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 21:01 +0000, Arun Ramamurthy wrote:
>>>> Added ioctl and interrupt handler functions to support FBIO_WAITFORVSYNC
>>>> Also corrected documentation to make interrupts and interrupt-names
>>>> optional as they are not required properties.
>>>
>>> You may not be aware of this fact, but its the "documentation" what
>>> defines what properties are required...
>>>
>> Pawel, I was not aware of that. Since the driver code did not require
>> the interrupts or interrupt-names bindings to load properly, I moved it
>> out of the required properties. I can remove that change.
>
> Cool. Drivers don't have to use all available properties :-) The
> interrupt names are required because CLCD can be wired up with a single,
> combined interrupt or with 4 separate interrupt lines (see "A.4. On-chip
> signals", in the TRM) and the binding has to provide ways of describing
> this. Yes, one could say "1 number == combined, 4 numbers == split", but
> I personally prefer to be explicit than implicit.
>
> Just request the interrupt by name and you'll be fine.
>
Ok got it, will make the necessary changes
>> Any other comments on this change? Thanks
>
> I have no experience with the vsync ioctl, so can't really comment on
> it. One minor thing I did spot is your use of curly brackets in one of
> the switch cases:
>
> On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 21:01 +0000, Arun Ramamurthy wrote:
> @@ -466,6 +468,73 @@ static int clcdfb_pan_display(struct fb_var_screeninfo *var,
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +static int clcdfb_ioctl(struct fb_info *info,
>> + unsigned int cmd, unsigned long args)
>> +{
>> + struct clcd_fb *fb = to_clcd(info);
>> + int retval = 0;
>> + u32 val, ienb_val;
>> +
>> + switch (cmd) {
>> + case FBIO_WAITFORVSYNC:{
>
> In the line above...
>
>> + if (fb->lcd_irq <= 0) {
>> + retval = -EINVAL;
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + /* disable Vcomp interrupts */
>> + ienb_val = readl(fb->regs + fb->off_ienb);
>> + ienb_val &= ~CLCD_PL111_IENB_VCOMP;
>> + writel(ienb_val, fb->regs + fb->off_ienb);
>> +
>> + /* clear Vcomp interrupt */
>> + writel(CLCD_PL111_IENB_VCOMP, fb->regs + CLCD_PL111_ICR);
>> +
>> + /* Generate Interrupt at the start of Vsync */
>> + reinit_completion(&fb->wait);
>> + val = readl(fb->regs + fb->off_cntl);
>> + val &= ~(CNTL_LCDVCOMP(3));
>> + writel(val, fb->regs + fb->off_cntl);
>> +
>> + /* enable Vcomp interrupt */
>> + ienb_val = readl(fb->regs + fb->off_ienb);
>> + ienb_val |= CLCD_PL111_IENB_VCOMP;
>> + writel(ienb_val, fb->regs + fb->off_ienb);
>> + if (!wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout
>> + (&fb->wait, HZ/10))
>> + retval = -ETIMEDOUT;
>> + break;
>> + }
>
> ... and here.
>
> Not sure it's needed?
>
No its not needed, I can remove it.
> Pawel
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists