[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54F7FE45.5000100@bmw-carit.de>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 07:57:09 +0100
From: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@...-carit.de>
To: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@...marydata.com>,
<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <bfields@...ldses.org>,
<viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locks: fix fasync_struct memory leak in lease upgrade/downgrade
handling
Hi Jeff,
On 03/05/2015 01:06 AM, Jeff Layton wrote:
> Commit 8634b51f6ca2 (locks: convert lease handling to file_lock_context)
> introduced a regression in the handling of lease upgrade/downgrades.
>
> In the event that we already have a lease on a file and are going to
> either upgrade or downgrade it, we skip doing any list insertion or
> deletion and skip to re-calling lm_setup on the existing lease.
>
> As of commit 8634b51f6ca2 however, we end up calling lm_setup on the
> lease that was passed in, instead of on the existing lease. This causes
> us to leak the fasync_struct that was allocated in the event that there
> was not already an existing one (as it always appeared that there
> wasn't one).
>
> Fixes: 8634b51f6ca2 (locks: convert lease handling to file_lock_context)
Yes, that fixes the problem. Thanks!
> Reported-by: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@...-carit.de>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@...marydata.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@...-carit.de>
cheers,
daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists