[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1425513974-27153-1-git-send-email-jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 19:06:14 -0500
From: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@...marydata.com>
To: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bfields@...ldses.org,
daniel.wagner@...-carit.de, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: [PATCH] locks: fix fasync_struct memory leak in lease upgrade/downgrade handling
Commit 8634b51f6ca2 (locks: convert lease handling to file_lock_context)
introduced a regression in the handling of lease upgrade/downgrades.
In the event that we already have a lease on a file and are going to
either upgrade or downgrade it, we skip doing any list insertion or
deletion and skip to re-calling lm_setup on the existing lease.
As of commit 8634b51f6ca2 however, we end up calling lm_setup on the
lease that was passed in, instead of on the existing lease. This causes
us to leak the fasync_struct that was allocated in the event that there
was not already an existing one (as it always appeared that there
wasn't one).
Fixes: 8634b51f6ca2 (locks: convert lease handling to file_lock_context)
Reported-by: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@...-carit.de>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@...marydata.com>
---
fs/locks.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c
index 365c82e1b3a9..f1bad681fc1c 100644
--- a/fs/locks.c
+++ b/fs/locks.c
@@ -1665,7 +1665,8 @@ generic_add_lease(struct file *filp, long arg, struct file_lock **flp, void **pr
}
if (my_fl != NULL) {
- error = lease->fl_lmops->lm_change(my_fl, arg, &dispose);
+ lease = my_fl;
+ error = lease->fl_lmops->lm_change(lease, arg, &dispose);
if (error)
goto out;
goto out_setup;
--
2.1.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists