[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54F83EF3.4070903@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 11:33:07 +0000
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@...aro.org>,
"eric.auger@...com" <eric.auger@...com>,
"christoffer.dall@...aro.org" <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Andre Przywara <Andre.Przywara@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"patches@...aro.org" <patches@...aro.org>,
"gleb@...nel.org" <gleb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 5/5] KVM: arm/arm64: add irqfd support
On 05/03/15 11:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 05/03/2015 11:53, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQFD
>>> + case KVM_CAP_IRQFD:
>>> + r = vgic_present;
>>> + break;
>>> +#endif
>>
>> Nitpick: we have "select HAVE_KVM_IRQFD", so we can lose the #ifdef-ery.
>
> Alternatively, I've just posted a patch to move the KVM_CAP_IRQFD case
> to common code.
>
> vgic_present probably should be replaced by
> IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_VGIC). I've sent a patch for this.
Right. We can probably take this at the same time as Eric's series.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists