[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150305122459.GC14093@leverpostej>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 12:24:59 +0000
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
Cc: "kgene@...nel.org" <kgene@...nel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@....com>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>, "olof@...om.net" <olof@...om.net>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
"inki.dae@...sung.com" <inki.dae@...sung.com>,
"chanho61.park@...sung.com" <chanho61.park@...sung.com>,
"sw0312.kim@...sung.com" <sw0312.kim@...sung.com>,
"jh80.chung@...sung.com" <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
"ideal.song@...sung.com" <ideal.song@...sung.com>,
"a.kesavan@...sung.com" <a.kesavan@...sung.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/9] arm64: dts: exynos: Add dts files for 64-bit
Exynos5433 SoC
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 05:38:23AM +0000, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> This patch adds new Exynos5433 dtsi to support 64-bit Exynos5433 SoC based on
> Octal core CPUs (quad Cortex-A57 and quad Cortex-A53). And Exynos5433 supports
> PSCI (Power State Coordination Interface) v0.1.
>
> This patch includes following dt node to support Exynos5433 SoC:
> 1. Octa core for big.LITTLE architecture
> - Cortex-A53 LITTLE Quad-core
> - Cortex-A57 big Quad-core
> - Support PSCI v0.1
[...]
> + psci {
> + compatible = "arm,psci";
> + method = "smc";
> + cpu_off = <0x84000002>;
> + cpu_on = <0xC4000003>;
> + };
Back at v2 you mentioned that CPU_OFF wasn't working [1].
Do both CPU_ON and CPU_OFF work for all CPUs, including the boot CPU?
I take it CPUs boot at EL2?
[...]
> + timer {
> + compatible = "arm,armv8-timer";
> + interrupts = <1 13 0xff04>,
> + <1 14 0xff04>,
> + <1 11 0xff04>,
> + <1 10 0xff04>;
> + };
The timer node should be moved under the root node. It doesn't live on
the bus; it's a component of the CPU.
Thanks,
Mark.
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/2/413
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists