[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150307002447.GE993@katana>
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2015 01:24:48 +0100
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com>
Cc: "christian.ruppert@...tech.com" <christian.ruppert@...tech.com>,
"mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com" <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com" <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>,
"andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com"
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
"christian.ruppert@...lis.com" <christian.ruppert@...lis.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: designware: Suppress error message if
platform_get_irq() returns -EPROBE_DEFER
> > Presented like this I wonder if this merits being a dev_err at all.
> > Wouldn't dev_dbg be more adequate? This might remove the need for the
> > condition and also avoid bothering everyone if something in the platform
> > device structures or device tree is not right.
> >
> > > return irq; /* -ENXIO */
> > > }
>
> We've just had similar discussion related to DW APB UART with Andy here
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/3/412
>
> So yes probably we may safely remove error message from here completely.
So, do you want to send a V2?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists