[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1425889764.5234.13.camel@synopsys.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2015 08:29:24 +0000
From: Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com>
To: "wsa@...-dreams.de" <wsa@...-dreams.de>
CC: "mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com" <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com" <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>,
"andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com"
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
"christian.ruppert@...tech.com" <christian.ruppert@...tech.com>,
"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
"christian.ruppert@...lis.com" <christian.ruppert@...lis.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: designware: Suppress error message if
platform_get_irq() returns -EPROBE_DEFER
Hi Wolfram,
On Sat, 2015-03-07 at 01:24 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > Presented like this I wonder if this merits being a dev_err at all.
> > > Wouldn't dev_dbg be more adequate? This might remove the need for the
> > > condition and also avoid bothering everyone if something in the platform
> > > device structures or device tree is not right.
> > >
> > > > return irq; /* -ENXIO */
> > > > }
> >
> > We've just had similar discussion related to DW APB UART with Andy here
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/3/412
> >
> > So yes probably we may safely remove error message from here completely.
>
> So, do you want to send a V2?
Sorry for this delay - I was away for last few days.
I'm about to send v2 with removal of error message completely.
-Alexey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists