[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150309112608.GG28806@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2015 11:26:08 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@...r.at>
Cc: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@...dl.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
Xiubo Li <Li.Xiubo@...escale.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>,
abdoulaye berthe <berthe.ab@...il.com>,
patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: wm5100: match wait_for_completion_timeout return
type
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 07:22:26AM +0100, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Mar 2015, Mark Brown wrote:
> > You are sending these to a very large CC list many of whom have no
> > obvious connection to the driver - please take care to ensure that the
> > people you are sending patches to are likely to want to review the code,
> > this helps keep people's mailboxes less noisy.
> sorry if I messed that up - my understanding was that
> it should go out to all that scripts/get_mainteiner.pl shows
> for the espective file. Should some of those listed
> not be put on the CC list - or only maintainers+mailinglists ?
No, if you're doing that based on the --git option it'll typically get a
lot of false positives for people doing coe cleanups for things.
Without git it's a bit more reliable but may miss people who work on the
code but aren't in MAINTAINERS.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists