[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1425900552.6715.7.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 12:29:12 +0100
From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...onical.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] locking: ww_mutex: Allow to use rt_mutex instead of
mutex for the baselock
On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 12:07 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 03/09/2015 11:51 AM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > Why do both mutex and rtmutex then exist one might ask? ;-) No big deal
> > either way though, it's not like it becomes immutable once applied.
>
> You don't choose rtmutex afaik. rtmutex is used by futex (only?)
Almost only, but not quite.
drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx.h: struct rt_mutex i2c_bus_lock;
include/linux/i2c.h: struct rt_mutex bus_lock;
kernel/rcu/tree.h: struct rt_mutex boost_mtx;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists