lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 9 Mar 2015 18:25:03 +0530
From:	Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] staging: sm750fb: fix undeclared function

On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 03:42:22PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 01:05:06PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > kbuild test robot reported that for microblaze-allyesconfig
> > chan_to_field() and lynxfb_ops_set_par() were not defined. These two
> > functions were defined under CONFIG_PM, so for any archtecture if
> > CONFIG_PM is not defined we will have this error.
> > 
> > while moving the lynxfb_suspend() function some very obvious
> > checkpatch errors, like space after comma, space after if, space
> > before opening brace, were taken care of.
> 
> I have a script to review patches moving functions around but these
> white space changes break my script so I have to review it by hand.
> Sucks.

oops . sorry ..
> 
> >  static int lynxfb_ops_set_par(struct fb_info * info)
<snip>
> >  static inline unsigned int chan_to_field(unsigned int chan,struct fb_bitfield * bf)
> >  {
> >  	chan &= 0xffff;
> 
> These white space changes are not related.
if you want i can break it into multiple patches, so that reviewing can be easy and your script will not break :) .
Actually I thought, since this is a vendor crude driver there will be many such changes, so if i can combine some changes together then atleast the number of patches can be kept low and also i thought of clubbing these changes together as Joe Perches once told me "Don't get carried away with patch type separation" (reference: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/1/1/2).

regards
sudip

> 
> regards,
> dan carpenter
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ