[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150309145453.GB11015@mwanda>
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2015 17:54:53 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Matteo Semenzato <mattew8898@...il.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] Staging: rtl8188eu: fix double unlock
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 03:21:13PM +0100, Matteo Semenzato wrote:
> Il giorno lun, 09/03/2015 alle 12.16 +0300, Dan Carpenter ha scritto:
> > Why is it a RESEND?
> >
> > RESEND is a bit rude because it implies that we messed up by ignoring
> > your first email so you're sending us the exact same thing again.
> > Sometimes rudeness is valid if people are ignoring good patches but you
> > send the first email 4 minutes before sending the second email.
> This patch is a RESEND because i forgot to remove PATCH 2/2 from the subject.
> > On Sat, Mar 07, 2015 at 04:33:27PM +0100, Matteo Semenzato wrote:
> > > From: Matteo Semenzato <mattew8898@...il.com>
> >
> > No need for this, we can get it from your email.
> >
> > >
> > > The rtw_cmd_thread semaphore was being unlocked twice.
> >
> > This patch is probably correct, but it's a bit risky without testing or
> > further analysis. Please explain how you verified that it won't cause
> > a deadlock.
> This patch is wrong because it tries to call down on a semaphore that is
> initialized to 0 and the semaphore is not unlocked anywhere else.
Yep. Just remove the locking and use kthread_stop() in
rtw_stop_drv_threads().
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists