| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 15:21:13 +0100 From: Matteo Semenzato <mattew8898@...il.com> To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] Staging: rtl8188eu: fix double unlock Il giorno lun, 09/03/2015 alle 12.16 +0300, Dan Carpenter ha scritto: > Why is it a RESEND? > > RESEND is a bit rude because it implies that we messed up by ignoring > your first email so you're sending us the exact same thing again. > Sometimes rudeness is valid if people are ignoring good patches but you > send the first email 4 minutes before sending the second email. This patch is a RESEND because i forgot to remove PATCH 2/2 from the subject. > On Sat, Mar 07, 2015 at 04:33:27PM +0100, Matteo Semenzato wrote: > > From: Matteo Semenzato <mattew8898@...il.com> > > No need for this, we can get it from your email. > > > > > The rtw_cmd_thread semaphore was being unlocked twice. > > This patch is probably correct, but it's a bit risky without testing or > further analysis. Please explain how you verified that it won't cause > a deadlock. This patch is wrong because it tries to call down on a semaphore that is initialized to 0 and the semaphore is not unlocked anywhere else. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists