linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] media/v4l2-ctrls: Always run s

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPybu_0TWnPS2cXjmRysht8JFZMn0rPHtxoAqXikn57A4jv73g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 9 Mar 2015 17:45:19 +0100
From:	Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@...il.com>
To:	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc:	Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>,
	Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
	Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
	Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
	Antti Palosaari <crope@....fi>,
	linux-media <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] media/v4l2-ctrls: Always run s_ctrl on volatile ctrls

Hello

Back from holidays and back to this issue. Sorry for the delay.

> I'm not sure about Ricardo's use case, is it the one we've discussed on #v4l ?
> If so, and if I recall correctly, the idea was to perform an action with a
> parameter, and didn't require volatility.

In my case, there is a trigger overflow bit. The user acks the trigger
overflow by writting any value to the control.

There is no parameter. In that sense it looks like a volatile read + a
button on a controll.

> Your proposal is interesting as well, but I'm not sure about the
> V4L2_CTRL_FLAG_ACTION name. Aren't all controls supposed to have an action of
> some sort ? That's nitpicking of course.

What about the name STATELESS_WRITE ? or perhaps VOLATILE_WRITE? I
dont care about the name :), but better have it solved before I write
the doc :P

>
> Also, should the action flag be automatically set for button controls ? Button
> controls would in a way become type-less controls with the action flag set,
> that's interesting. I suppose type-less controls without the action flag don't
> make sense.

I agree!


Best regards and thanks!

-- 
Ricardo Ribalda
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/