[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150310060013.GA13704@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 07:00:13 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4 v2] x86: entry_64.S: steps towards simpler iret frame
handling
* Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com> wrote:
> These changes make SYSENTER64 code path save flags and user's
> stack pointer in pt_regs->flags and pt_regs->sp, where they belong.
>
> As a result, we can drop stub_iopl() and thread_struct::usersp.
>
> Usage of PER_CPU(old_rsp) is reduced to bare minimum.
>
> FIXUP/RESTORE_TOP_OF_STACK macros are on diet too.
>
> Changes since v1: on Ingo's request, split into 4 patches intead of 2.
Unfortunately I got only 1/4 and 3/4, the other two patches are
missing. They are not in my lkml and spam folders either.
Note that the missing mails:
> Denys Vlasenko (4):
> x86: save r11 into pt_regs->flags on SYSCALL64 fastpath
> Remove stub_iopl
> x86: save user %rsp in pt_regs->sp on SYSCALL64 fastpath
> Remove unused stuff
2/4 and 4/4 Have rather short titles, so maybe some spam trap ate
them? Prefix them with 'x86: '?
Weird.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists