[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <15697793.jrEQ5UURAe@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 23:30:44 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...oraproject.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>,
"sriram@...irs.net.in" <sriram@...irs.net.in>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Bad rpath in cpupower with 4.0-rcX
On Tuesday, March 10, 2015 08:33:54 AM Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...oraproject.org> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Commit 5c1de006e8e66 (cpupower Makefile change to help run the tool
> > without 'make install') added an rpath to the cpupower binary. From
> > what I can understand, this is to make it easier to run cpupower from
> > the local build directory without having to run make install. It does
> > accomplish that, but it also leaves the binary with the rpath in it
> > which is considered bad practice. It also causes cpupower to fail in
> > rpmbuild with the following error:
> >
> > ERROR 0004: file '/usr/bin/cpupower' contains an insecure rpath './'
> > in [./]
> > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.A6u26r (%install)
> > Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.A6u26r (%install)
> >
> > I understand the want for eased development, but couldn't people just
> > set LD_LIBRARY_PATH instead?
>
> No comments on this? Should I just send a revert patch instead?
You can do that.
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists