[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD3Xx4KPcWYpK0us2O+Ct67yYiNb1=ZXR7GhR0FMcchCjhMy8A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 09:21:11 +0100
From: Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@...il.com>
To: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
Cc: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Inki Dae <inki.dae@...sung.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Andreas Ruprecht <rupran@...server.de>,
hengelein Stefan <stefan.hengelein@....de>,
Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
김국진@kernel.org <kgene@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: ARCH_EXYNOS5433 missing in Kconfig
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 2:10 AM, Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com> wrote:
> Hi Valentin,
>
> I sent the Exynos5433 clock patch and then separately I'm sending the
> Exynos5433 devicetree patch-set[1].
> [1] [PATCH v6 0/9] arm64: Add the support for new Exynos5433 SoC
> - https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/9/1036
>
> But, according to Arnd bergmann's comment[2], latest Exynos5433 dt patch-set[1]
> removed the CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS5433.
> [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/24/85
>
>
> So, I have plan to send following patch.
Great! Thanks for your reply and the explanation.
Kind regards,
Valentin
> ---
> clk: samsung: Use CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS instead of Exynos-specific configuration
>
> This patch removes the CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS{5433|7} and then use only the
> CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS for ARM-64bit Exynos SoC.
>
> Cc: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>
> Cc: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
> ---
> drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile b/drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile
> index 17e9af7..561719d 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile
> @@ -10,11 +10,11 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5250) += clk-exynos5250.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5260) += clk-exynos5260.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5410) += clk-exynos5410.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5420) += clk-exynos5420.o
> -obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS5433) += clk-exynos5433.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS) += clk-exynos5433.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5440) += clk-exynos5440.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS) += clk-exynos-audss.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS) += clk-exynos-clkout.o
>
>
> Regards,
> Chanwoo Choi
>
>
> On 03/11/2015 12:32 AM, Valentin Rothberg wrote:
>> Hi Chanwoo,
>>
>> your commit 96bd6224f07b ("clk: samsung: exynos5433: Add clocks using
>> common clock framework") is included in today's linux-next tree (i.e.,
>> next-20150310).
>>
>> This patch conditionally compiles clk-exynos5433.c depending on the
>> Kconfig option ARCH_EXYNOS5433. However, this option is not defined
>> in Kconfig, so that the driver cannot be compiled at the current
>> state:
>>
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS5433) += clk-exynos5433.o
>>
>> Is there a patch queued somewhere that adds this Kconfig symbol? I
>> detected the issue by running undertaker-checkpatch from the
>> Undertaker tool suite (undertaker.cs.fau.de). There is also a tool in
>> the git tree that can detect such issues (i.e.,
>> scripts/checkkconfigsymbols.py).
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Valentin
>>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists