[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55006DC4.2020002@yandex-team.ru>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 19:31:00 +0300
From: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>
To: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@...il.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
CC: "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mm, procfs: account for shmem swap in /proc/pid/smaps
On 11.03.2015 18:26, Jerome Marchand wrote:
> On 03/11/2015 04:03 PM, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
>> On 11.03.2015 15:30, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz> wrote:
>>>> Currently, /proc/pid/smaps will always show "Swap: 0 kB" for
>>>> shmem-backed
>>>> mappings, even if the mapped portion does contain pages that were
>>>> swapped out.
>>>> This is because unlike private anonymous mappings, shmem does not
>>>> change pte
>>>> to swap entry, but pte_none when swapping the page out. In the smaps
>>>> page
>>>> walk, such page thus looks like it was never faulted in.
>>>
>>> Maybe just add count of swap entries allocated by mapped shmem into
>>> swap usage of this vma? That's isn't exactly correct for partially
>>> mapped shmem but this is something weird anyway.
>>
>> Something like that (see patch in attachment)
>>
>
> -8<---
>
> diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
> index cf2d0ca010bc..492f78f51fc2 100644
> --- a/mm/shmem.c
> +++ b/mm/shmem.c
> @@ -1363,6 +1363,13 @@ static struct mempolicy *shmem_get_policy(struct
> vm_area_struct *vma,
> }
> #endif
>
> +static unsigned long shmem_get_swap_usage(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> +{
> + struct inode *inode = file_inode(vma->vm_file);
> +
> + return SHMEM_I(inode)->swapped;
> +}
> +
> int shmem_lock(struct file *file, int lock, struct user_struct *user)
> {
> struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
>
> -8<---
>
> That will not work for shared anonymous mapping since they all share the
> same vm_file (/dev/zero).
Nope. They have different files and inodes.
They're just called "/dev/zero (deleted)".
>
> Jerome
>
--
Konstantin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists