linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] mm, procfs: account for shmem swap in /proc/pid/smaps

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5500932F.6030107@suse.cz>
Date:	Wed, 11 Mar 2015 20:10:39 +0100
From:	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To:	Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@...il.com>
CC:	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
	linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mm, procfs: account for shmem swap in /proc/pid/smaps

On 03/11/2015 01:30 PM, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz> wrote:
>> Currently, /proc/pid/smaps will always show "Swap: 0 kB" for shmem-backed
>> mappings, even if the mapped portion does contain pages that were swapped out.
>> This is because unlike private anonymous mappings, shmem does not change pte
>> to swap entry, but pte_none when swapping the page out. In the smaps page
>> walk, such page thus looks like it was never faulted in.
>
> Maybe just add count of swap entries allocated by mapped shmem into
> swap usage of this vma? That's isn't exactly correct for partially
> mapped shmem but this is something weird anyway.

Yeah for next version I want to add a patch optimizing for the 
(hopefully) common cases:

1. SHMEM_I(inode)->swapped is 0 - no need to consult radix tree
2. shmem inode is mapped fully (I hope it's ok to just compare its size 
and mapping size) - just use the value of SHMEM_I(inode)->swapped like 
you suggest



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/