[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55007288.20008@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 09:51:20 -0700
From: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com>
To: Markos Chandras <Markos.Chandras@...tec.com>, ralf@...ux-mips.org
CC: linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@...tec.com>,
David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "MIPS: mm: tlbex: Use cpu_has_mips_r2_exec_hazard
for the EHB instruction"
On 03/11/2015 01:28 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 02/23/2015 10:52 PM, David Daney wrote:
>> From: David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
>>
>> This reverts commit 77f3ee59ee7cfe19e0ee48d9a990c7967fbfcbed.
>>
>> There are two problems:
>>
>> 1) It breaks OCTEON, which will now crash in early boot with:
>>
>> Kernel panic - not syncing: No TLB refill handler yet (CPU type: 80)
>>
>> 2) The logic is broken.
>>
>> The meaning of cpu_has_mips_r2_exec_hazard is that the EHB instruction
>> is required. The offending patch attempts (and fails) to change the
>> meaning to be that EHB is part of the ISA.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
>> ---
> Hi,
>
> First of all sorry about the octeon breakage.
>
> However, whilst this patch will fix Octeon it will break R6
>
But breaking R6 is not a regression, breaking OCTEON is. For new code,
there is this bit of asymmetry.
> Can we please consider another patch that will simply use
> cpu_has_mips_r2_r6 instead of cpu_has_mips_r2 so both will work in 4.0?
>
If you have a patch that fixes the problem properly, please post it for
consideration.
Thanks,
David Daney
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists