[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55015267.4050108@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 10:46:31 +0200
From: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: dheitmueller@...nellabs.com, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] usb: xhci: apply XHCI_AVOID_BEI quirk to Intel ValleyView
and LynxPoint LP
On 12.03.2015 03:39, Lu Baolu wrote:
> When a device with an isochronous endpoint is plugged into the Intel
> xHCI host controller, and the driver submits multiple frames per URB,
> the xHCI driver will set the Block Event Interrupt (BEI) flag on all
> but the last TD for the URB. This causes the host controller to place
> an event on the event ring, but not send an interrupt. When the last
> TD for the URB completes, BEI is cleared, and we get an interrupt for
> the whole URB.
>
> However, under some Intel xHCI host controllers like ValleyView and
> Lynx Point LP, if the event ring is full of events from transfers with
> BEI set, a "Event Ring is Full" event will be posted to the last entry
> of the event ring, but no interrupt is generated. Host will cease all
> transfer and command executions and wait until software completes
> handling the pending events in event ring. That means xHC stops but
> event of "event ring is full" is not notified. As the result, the xHC
> looks like dead to user.
>
> The patch is to apply XHCI_AVOID_BEI to Intel VallyView and Lynx Point
> LP devices. And it should be backported to kernels as old as 3.0, that
> contains the commit 69e848c2090a ("Intel xhci: Support EHCI/xHCI port
> switching.")
>
Maybe we should set the quirk for all Intel xHCI controllers.
So far the list includes Pantherpoint, Lynxpoint and valleyview.
I bet it concerns most Intel platforms.
-Mathias
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists