[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55019FB7.1000806@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 09:16:23 -0500
From: Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@...cle.com>
To: Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>, trivial@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC: jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Jfs-discussion] [PATCH 19/22] jfs: %pF is only for function
pointers
On 03/11/2015 10:13 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> Use %pS for actual addresses, otherwise you'll get bad output
> on arches like ppc64 where %pF expects a function descriptor.
>
> Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
> Cc: jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net
Acked-by: Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@...cle.com>
Do you intend to submit these as a set, or would you rather I push this
one through the jfs subsystem?
Thanks,
Shaggy
> ---
> fs/jfs/super.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/jfs/super.c b/fs/jfs/super.c
> index 5d30c56..4cd9798 100644
> --- a/fs/jfs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/jfs/super.c
> @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ void jfs_error(struct super_block *sb, const char *fmt, ...)
> vaf.fmt = fmt;
> vaf.va = &args;
>
> - pr_err("ERROR: (device %s): %pf: %pV\n",
> + pr_err("ERROR: (device %s): %ps: %pV\n",
> sb->s_id, __builtin_return_address(0), &vaf);
>
> va_end(args);
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists